Skip to content
Historic Prism
About
About Historic Prism Editorial manifesto

A documentary publication on power, states and their narratives.

Historic Prism is an editorial and documentary publication focused on forms of power, states, peoples and the narratives that shape the meaning of political turning points. Its signature, “Power, Peoples, States & Narratives”, defines this editorial field.

Why this publication?

Take the time to understand the mechanisms.

Political narratives surround us: speeches of liberation, promises of rupture, calls to resistance, stories of victory, defeat or betrayal. Behind them stand institutions, interests, memories, men and women — and words that give events their meaning.

Historic Prism does more than recount what happened. Each dossier begins with a question, confronts sources, restores events to their context and shows how the same fact can take on different meanings depending on the period, the camp or the memory through which it is read.

We do not claim a view from nowhere. On colonial history in particular, we begin with the societies subjected to conquest, domination and exploitation. A road, railway, port or institution is therefore never detached from why it was created, the labour that built it, the flows it served, who benefited from it and the costs imposed on local populations. That perspective is explicit; the facts supporting it remain verifiable and disputed causal claims are attributed.

Our promise

Document. Contextualise. Compare. Interpret.

Document

Begin with archives, speeches, official texts, academic work and verifiable sources before constructing a narrative.

Contextualise

Place events back within their history, institutions, memories and the balance of forces that made them possible.

Compare

Put trajectories, countries and periods side by side to reveal mechanisms that extend beyond a single case.

Interpret

Offer an authored reading while explicitly distinguishing established fact, allegation, controversy, hypothesis and interpretation.

Facts are sourced. Interpretations are owned. The two are clearly distinguished.
What we aim to do

Start from questions that go beyond biographies and timelines. Give readers the means to distinguish established fact, allegation, hypothesis, controversy and interpretation. Compare narratives without erasing the historical power relations that produce them. On colonial subjects, make visible domination, dispossession, coerced labour, resource extraction, the destination of profits, and documented human, food-security, social and environmental consequences.

What we reject

Sensationalism, false balance, evidence-free activism and content production for its own sake. We also reject presenting a material outcome of colonial rule as a standalone “benefit” while detaching it from domination, labour regimes, economic purpose and the costs borne by the populations concerned. Publishing frequency must never weaken research, verification or narrative quality.

Intellectual territory

Twelve themes in one editorial universe.

PowerPeoplesNarrativesMemorySovereigntyComparative historyState & territoryPolitical rupturesInternal fracturesJustice after powerInterregnum powersArmed powers
Method

The more serious, disputed or consequential a claim is, the higher and more explicit its standard of evidence must be.

Research. Whenever possible, begin with primary sources: full speeches, official texts, audiovisual archives and public documents.

Cross-checking. Verify sensitive facts through several independent sources.

Qualification. Distinguish established fact, allegation, hypothesis, controversy and interpretation.

Traceability. Keep the exact reference for a quotation, archive, page, timestamp or document.

The public we want to bring together

People who believe political events are more complex than the stories they are given about them.

Demanding readers, students, teachers, history enthusiasts, essay readers, diasporas and transnational audiences: this community is defined more by an intellectual disposition than by age.

The publication

An intellectual home.

Historic Prism takes shape through web dossiers, visualisations, a newsletter, printed Cahiers, events and long-form essays. The website is its organised memory: content remains accessible, interconnected and enriched over time.

Created by Zakaria Dabone.